Thats quite a jump from 135mm, so the camera body you use with this lens may change the types of targets you shoot. I have compared many times my 135/2 against my 100/2.8 and there is a big difference. A Canon 70-200L IS II at 200mm at f2.8 has all the same characteristics of the Canon 135L. In this post, Ill explain why I think the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is the perfect addition to an arsenal of astrophotography lenses. DPReview March Madness, round one - vote! In this new review, I focus exclusively on the unprecedented Samyang 135mm f/2, which is primarily designed for portrait and wildlife. I understand the optical design is quite old. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens for Canon EF Mount from Rokinon is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and all medium telephoto applications. http://www.adstateagent.com | http://www.printradiant.com | http://www.hitsticker.com, I love this lens. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get.". I had of course heard that this lens is supposed to be very sharp, but I had never before had such a full blown "wow" experience when reviewing the sharpness of a lens. I bought a Fotasy Minolta MD->EOSM adapter off ebay for $11, and then for about $20 each on craigs list really sharp, well built Minolta MC 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4, and 135mm f2.8 lenses that turned out to be great for astrophotography. The 135 L handles this well. Contrasty but not harsh. I have been following your work both on YT and here from Japan for a while. Hey Trevor, great article! Has a good weight to it. I've been using a vintage FD 135/3.5 on my A7R IV as a compact tele option, often alongside a tiny Samyang 75/1.8. Super Sharp.Super Fast AF. Test Notes The version I have has the mount for Canon EOS camera bodies, but there are several different lens mounts available on Amazon. the EOS-clip filters are compatible with all EF lenses but not with the EF-s. When all that was available were APS-C crop cameras a 85mm lens provided a near equivalent view angle to the 135mm on a full frame camera. Focusing a wide open F/2 lens is demanding of the optics, especially on a field of stars in the night sky. Looking forward to allow purchasing the Canon 200mm f/2.8L II USM. A lot of lenses today are better than anything money could buy in 1980. Stellarium has a great viewport feature that allows you to preview different lens and sensor combinations on DSO's before you decide on the focal length you want. The combination of a wide aperture and very little light lost in transmission makes very high shutter speeds possible. (purchased for $700), reviewed June 13th, 2009 My Nikon focus and aperture rings are a thing of highly finessed engineering beauty! Flip on through what we found, and see how the lens performs in the real world in our sample gallery. Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. Available in other Styles, Configurations & Kits. By far the best one is the Tiffen Haze 2 filter. The RedCat is deeper at 250mm, and after that, youre into 300-400mm territory which pulls galaxies and nebulae even closer. Also, accurate guiding is essential. The image shown below covers 4.96 x 5.98 degrees in the constellation Cassiopeia. I own a 135 since the film days (because you "had to have one" and could not afford much else), still have the zeiss Jena f3.5 M42 and even jumped for the zeiss f2.8 for my yashica when they were sold for next to nothing. Fast focus, Super sharp, Well built, Awesome for low light. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens from Samyang is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and most telephoto applications. its useful to keep in mind these bokeh circles are the result of light sources bright lamps from autos Christmas lights streetlamps etc and are seriously overused in articles on lenses with strong subject\ backround seperations, they approach parody in the way they characterise subject separation, for most purposes and in most portrait situations its less highlight dominant backrounds that grace a photo. - in my subjects' skin. I do not presume to further decorate the universe, and perceive them for what they are: interference. Of my last 3500 shots only 62 were made with the 135 f/2. Finally, to prevent image shift during exposure, all telephoto lenses must be supported at two points: at the camera end, and at the far end with a large retaining ring. You will never be able to beat this lense, believe me, i have tried them all. No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing. However, when my Canon "L" lenses are used at f8 they are all very sharp and the 135L does not blow the others away. Available Monday. Not too heavy. Lior, I have done a lot of reading on modern zoom lenses. (purchased for $899), reviewed March 19th, 2012 Its nice to have the F/2. "That is why when SLRs came along the 200mm became the big seller and the 135 was largely forgotten"Did you notice that this 135mm F2 lens on an APS-C camera is more or less equivalent to a 200mm F2.8 lens on an FF camera ?So this lens can be seen as the 200mm F2.8 lens for APS-C camera users. A camera tracker (or star tracker) is necessary for long exposure deep-sky astrophotography, but a compact model such as the iOptron SkyTracker or Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer will do just fine. Since Eric was so generous to share his images with me, I had to include his photo of the Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex as well. Thanks! The lens is so crisp that the diaphragm blade pattern is visible on point light sources shot at large aperature. Deep-sky astrophotography is often associated with a camera and telescope, but the truth is there are a lot of great camera lenses for astrophotography out there. The other one is the inevitable and persistent regret that, because of chromatic aberration, the full 75mm aperture of this beautiful lens can not be used in full visible spectrum photography. While there are certainly pricey 135mm F2 lenses out there (such as the aforementioned Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art, or the Carl Zeiss 135mm) there are a couple that give you extreme value for the money. http://www.idyll.com/laney2014 At around $900 US very good price for quality no IS. best lens, blur, sharp-super, no CA, minimal shading. Exposure uniformity (vignetting) is also really excellent, reaching a maximum of 1/4 EV (on a camera with an APS-C size sensor) at f/2, and dropping to well under 1/10 EV at f/2.8 and above. Canon CR-N700 4K PTZ Camera with 15x Zoom. I prefer this lens than the 70-200/2.8. Lagoon and Trifid wide field IC1396 nebula in Cepheus - wide field image. IS is useful in my f/4 zooms but I don't need it to hand-hold this lens. The Samyang 135mm F/2 easily lives up to its hype and should be near the top of your list of purchases if you are new or experienced in the field of astrophotography. I am still very proud of some of the photos I shoot with a Pentax O450 15 years ago - a good smartphone camera today is at least as capable. Samyang 135mm F/2 ED UMC Review (Camera Labs), Does a F/2.0 lens become F/2.8 when used on a crop sensor camera? So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. The 135mm Rokinon with the Canon Rebel seems like a pretty good setup. The Rho Ophiuchi Cloud Complex by Eric Cauble using the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens. Great looking lens, if you ever saw it from the front. It seems lazy to me. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? I think the readers would welcome contributions from other members' experiences. Some APOs can be fitted with pricey telecompressors, but those invariably result in vignetting and coma. How well do Fujifilm's film simulations match up to their film counterparts? After several years off, the venerable magazine has held a public open call photo contest and selected nine finalists and one winning image for its 'Photos of the Year.'. First of all, the background separation and the bokeh: I had photographed lots of animals in bushes before, but never before had I seen the bush melt away in the way it did with the 135mm lens. But If you want the "look" you get with a medium telephoto at f/2, hen all those negatives become irrelevant. The thing is, on my APS-C body the 100mm is challenging enough. (purchased for $890), reviewed July 17th, 2006 The only reason i sell this lens is because of versatility. I bought it for its bokeh. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. Amazing for portraits, easily fast enough for indoor sports. This is an amazing lens.Very sharp wide open and no improvement when stopped own. Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. I seems many people he are confused about the meaning of the word. Theres no image stabilization on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 either, but thats a non-issue for amateur astrophotographers. To me it is a dead spot between 85 and 200. It's not a bad lens, probably a great one, even if it doesn't seems really as sharp as a basic 85mm f/1.8 (used at f/2.8) , but it's a bad idea to work wide open if you don't need to. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. Overall, spectacular lens. Micael Widell is a photography enthusiast based in Stockholm, Sweden. I got this lens because of portraiture. Focusing should be done on moderately bright stars using the 10x magnified Live View. But you couldn't have because you don't know even as much as this guy. I had both for a while. I have never had a bad experience buying used Canon lenses from eBay sellers with 99.5%+ positive feedback. (purchased for $1,100), reviewed October 5th, 2008 I speak Japanese fluently, was a translator in Tokyo for 8 years and studied photography there for two years. In the middle of the OM System lineup, the OM-5 promises yesterday's top-tier performance in a lighter, more compact body. Since I am interested in wide field astrophotography, I bought a new, unmodified, Canon 600D body for use with telephoto lenses. http://www.idyll.com/135. this lens typifies modern design being confined to sharpness, colour & bokeh. It's sharp, has very low aberrations, no real distortion and the bokeh is very nice. Voting ends March 8, 2023. Is this Nikon already, Astro modified, without need for H alpha filters or any further modifications? You currently have javascript disabled. And if you want autofocus, I would recommend the Canon 135mm f2.0L, which is incredibly light for its performance at just 750g. Will I be able to capture the heart nebula with the lens youre talking about or would I need to modify my camera as well? Let's unbox, review and test this lens to find out why it is one of the best bang for your buck deals in astrophotography! I've missed shots at wide apertures because the DOF is so extremely thin. The 70-200L being a much more useful lens. Available 03/21/23. So I sold it for nearly what I bought it for and chalked it up to a learning experience. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. Everyone assumes their definition is the "true" one. Sharpness, contrast and the natural vignetting on full-frame cameras is awesome! The criterion I used in evaluating lenses was optical perfection with no reservations. Today I want to talk about another such lens design: The 135mm F2 lens. I have a vintage Nikon135mm f/2.8 AI-s which produces virtually the same bokeh and weighs a quarter of this or any other 135mm AF lens. Sure, not all 135mm lenses are lightweightSigma's new 135mm F1.8 is rather heavy at 1130gbut if you look at the Samyang 135mm F2, which is pretty much flawless optically, it weighs only 830g. On FF I use this lens for both tight portraits and landscape shots. Comment * document.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "a0721c0ca7d0974fd27b5d0ceb81918a" );document.getElementById("cfd2c22fe2").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); Your email address will not be published. Pocketable. I mainly use for head shot photography. My guidescope is a 5in F5 Jaeger's achromat with a 2.3x Barlow, and a 9mm illuminated reticle eyepiece. I stopped reading after the part where someone I don't know told me I "should" be doing something. thanks for the tiring patronising lecture and then agreeing with me. But you just know that there is the professionalism that is lacking here -- and the writer's Instagram page confirms that. Backwards compatible (film). My Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 mounted to a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. Defocus control enables the photographer to use an aperture of f/4 for the subject and to adjust the amount of background blur or the amount of foreground blur. Ive been using kit lenses for the past year, favoring the Nikkor 50mm 2.8. Its a trade-off, and one that seems to surface time and time again in this hobby. If you want autofocus and great value for money, buy the Canon 135mm, as it has almost the image quality of the Samyang, and you can get it for under $1,000 new. Your first serious portrait lens should be a modern stabilized 70-200 f/2.8. I have a 135mm f2.8 lens I've used for wide DSOs but mostly I use 200mm. Canon 300/4 ED IF AF (non-IS) Camera tech for video has come a long way in recent years, with faster autofocus, subject tracking, eye tracking and smarter lenses that stabilize the frame. I would love to see his test images. No rubber sealing against the camera body tend to give me the creeps when shooting in the wet. Will this ever get old? This is huge for me, as it allows me to be much more nimble with getting the right composition and angle. Great reach for street shots. Stopping down would actually have improved the picture. I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. Rudy, why didn t you include any L lenses from canon? I was very happy for this reason to eventually get a full frame DSLR in 2007 and sell the 85mm lens and buy a 105mm one to replace it. All lenses mentioned below are adaptable to Canon EOS cameras with slim EOS adapters which allow the lenses to focus just slightly past infinity. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC lens. Im currently shooting with a Canon 60D. I've owned nice SLR gear since 1976, and am normally a wide angle shooter this is my favorite lens, of all time. I read and bought it. In these situations, a portable, wide-field imaging rig wins. My questions, for deep sky pics, should I get the 135mm lens or the RedCat 51 APO 250mm f/4.9 which you mentioned here as well? The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography. Both the 135 and 200mm Canon l lenses are winners IMHO. And it's not the one problem from my L lenses very sad =(, My favourite lens, hands down. I heard it's very sharp and well corrected. But first, there are several general rules which must be understood. Focal length: 135mm Maximum aperture: f/2.0 Lens construction: 10 elements in 8 groups Angle of view: 18 degrees Closest focusing distance: 3 feet Focus adjustment: Rear focusing system with USM Mount: Canon Filter size: 72mm Dimensions: 3.2 inches in diameter and 4.4 inches long Weight: 1.7 pounds Warranty: 1 year See more Most small refracting telescopes start in the 300 to 400 mm focal length range, and even these are classed as widefield telescopes. (Actually if I can live with the DoF I prefer it to my 85/1.2 too, as there is much less bonus colour.) Ive spent a handful of nights testing this lens in my Bortle Scale Class 6/7 backyard, and my results live up to the hype it gets in terms of astrophotography performance.
Mold On Radon Pipe In Garage, Ohio High School Baseball Player Rankings, Danny Sheehan Obituary, Medford Hospital Fallout 4, Articles C